Gavin Menzies’ Voyages

Gavin Menzies Essay Gavin Menzies was a royal navy submarine senior pilot that worked for the British government and now is trying to let the world know his opinion on the stripping of the Americas did the Chinese discover the Americas before Columbus? Menzies takes on a voyage where he tries to find demo to support his thesis and comes up with several different theories his first stop Calicut. Menzies claims that the Ming dynastys historied navigator Zheng He managed to reach the cape of good hope and from on that point he should gestate reached the Americas too.Gavin also claims that a famous Italian writer of the time, Nicolo Di Conti, superpower have made contact with Zheng s fleet in Calicut and might have also left with them for the New World Unfortunately for Menzies this idea was quickly discarded for there are historical records that suggest that Di Conti immediately returned back to Italy after his trip to Calicut ( he might have also carried some Chinese uses of th eir voyages with him).Menzies then pulls out some more evidence that a map found was possibly a Chinese map that led to the islands of the Antilles, but according to a hardly a(prenominal) historians and cartographers, the maps were confusing inaccurate and the islands were displaced in random places. The possibility of a slip expression on one of the tropic islands was rejected by many geologists that state that those rocks where there for no peculiar reason.Still not giving up on his quest, Gavin Menzies slightly alters his theory he affirms that an Italian, Verazzano, went on a voyage with the Chinese and stating that he proverb raft running like Chinese but as we already know, even Columbus, thought that the people he thought were Chinese but they were just the Native Ameri sack tribes that lived on the coastline.It was also confirm that Indigenous people were descendants of other Asian tribes that might have reached the Americas by crossing an fixed passage in North Ameri ca. There is no concrete information or evidence that the Chinese ever got to America, because if that were so than the Chinese would have set up outposts, settled or maybe started commerce the tropical goods with Europe and probably could have made a fortuneLastly, Menzies tries convincing the people when he claims that an old Chinese report states that the Ming fleet arrived at the shore of about 3000 different countries(the only way to do this was by reaching the Americas too) The Chinese historian that owned the archives rejects this last of Gavins theories because of a elementary calligraphy misunderstanding the Chinese character means 30 and means 3000 so the record can be misunderstood because the record actually just meant 30 different countriesAny claims concerning history, especially when it has been firmly accepted by historians and other professionals on that certain topic, should have reliable and plausible evidence on with clarifications and explanations to be supported That is how history has been built up so far and its how it will continue to be built. When an argument concerning history that relies on inaccurate evidence and unsupported theories, such as that found in Menzies show. The argument does not deserve to be reconsidered.